July 24, report. A team of researchers from France and Italy has found evidence that suggests testing of the Shroud of Turin back in was flawed. In their paper published in Oxford University's Archaeometry , the group describes their reanalysis of the data used in the prior study, and what they found. Back in , a team of researchers was granted access to the Shroud of Turin—a small piece of cloth that many believe was used to cover the face of Christ after crucifixion. As part of the research effort, several research entities were chosen to examine individual pieces of cloth from the shroud, but in the end, only three were allowed to do so: The University of Arizona in the U. After testing was concluded, the researchers announced that all three research groups had dated their cloth snippets to a time between and —evidence that the shroud was not from the time of Christ.
Medical Analysis of the Shroud of Turin: The Mantle of Jesus If you took the name Jesus out of the Shroud of Turin case file and it was confirmed by 21st Century Forensic Science that the bloodstains and image on the Shroud was a 3rd Century Crucifixion victim it would be accepted as being authentic and there would not be a single person in this world trying to convince you it is fake. No one would be attacking it or spending millions of dollars to convince you it is not real, but yet they are spending millions of dollars to tell us the Shroud is fake?! Because it is real and it has the name Jesus associated to it that is why. Mainly the Sanhedrin, the governing authority at the time who thought they were elite, better than, more important than and more attractive than others, they did not acknowledge the good works of Jesus, instead they called him an imposter, a fake, when in fact they themselves were fake.
The Turin Shroud is a fake. In the latest, but almost certainly not final instalment, they have used modern forensic techniques to show that apparent blood spatters on the shroud could only have been produced by someone moving to adopt different poses — rather than lying still, in the manner of a dead and yet to be resurrected Messiah. Forensic scientist Dr Matteo Borrini of Liverpool John Moores University and Luigi Garlaschelli of the University of Pavia used a living volunteer and real and synthetic blood to try to simulate possible ways that the apparent bloodstains could have got onto the shroud. This could be consistent with someone who had been crucified with their arms held in a Y shape.
Some claim the image depicts Jesus of Nazareth and the fabric is the burial shroud in which he was wrapped after crucifixion. First mentioned in , the shroud was denounced in by the local bishop of Troyes as a fake. In , radiocarbon dating established that the shroud was from the Middle Ages , between the years and
i love your lips. kiss me
Your ass is so beautiful ! I wanna touch it !
delicious!
Are you ready to swallow some cum there?
Hey sexy . Let's have phone sex
hmmmm.ce te-as fute